struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ted Husted" <hus...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Date Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:15:24 GMT
I doubt that there will be enough binding GA votes for the release
when the i18n tag is broken. We'll just have to go on to 2.0.8 as soon
as a new XW release is available.

-Ted.

On 3/27/07, Rene Gielen <gielen@it-neering.net> wrote:
> I should have fixed the according XWork issue [1] for XW 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.
>    To fix WW-1856, we have to upgrade XWork dependency.
>
> Unfortunately, the conditions under which this issue shows up are far
> from rare. Any use of the i18n tag is likely to cause troubles. I can
> reproduce various cases where a simple POST with an Action.execute()
> target produces unreadable pages due to inproper text resolving.
>
> Therefore I would consider this issue as blocker for making 2.0.7 a GA
> release. Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> - Rene
>
> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>
> Rene Gielen schrieb:
> > I seem to have the same issue here in a customer project, but since it is portlet
environment, I was not sure yet whether it was a porlet related issue...
> >
> > - Rene
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST), "Rainer Hermanns" <hermanns@aixcept.de>
wrote:
> >> James,
> >>
> >> there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be related.
> >> I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
> >> ASAP with this and other fixes.
> >>
> >> +1 for beta
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> Rainer
> >>
> >> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
> >>
> >>> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
> >>> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
> >>> that it's broke.
> >>>
> >>> Can someone confirm?
> >>>
> >>> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> James Mitchell
> >>> The Ruby Roundup
> >>> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
> >>>>
> >>>>    Release notes:
> >>>>
> >>>>        * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
> >>>>
> >>>>    Distribution:
> >>>>
> >>>>        * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
> >>>>
> >>>>    The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> >>>> is, it will be in the usual location:
> >>>>
> >>>>        * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> >>>> repository/
> >>>>
> >>>>    Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> >>>> respond with a vote on its quality:
> >>>>
> >>>>    [ ] Leave at test build
> >>>>    [ ] Alpha
> >>>>    [ ] Beta
> >>>>    [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >>>>
> >>>>    Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> >>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> >>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >>>>
> >>>>    The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> >>>> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> >>>> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> >>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> >>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> >>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> >>>> list.
> >>>>
> >>>>    As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> >>>> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> >>>> agreeing to help do the work
> >>>>
> >>>> -Ted.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message