struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David H. DeWolf" <ddew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Date Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:20:26 GMT
Agreed, but that doesn't prevent us from finalizing 2.0.7 as beta though 
does it?  Since most of the work is already done, it seems worth putting 
out there for those that prefer the other 2.0.7 fixes to the i18n tag?

Ted Husted wrote:
> I doubt that there will be enough binding GA votes for the release
> when the i18n tag is broken. We'll just have to go on to 2.0.8 as soon
> as a new XW release is available.
> 
> -Ted.
> 
> On 3/27/07, Rene Gielen <gielen@it-neering.net> wrote:
>> I should have fixed the according XWork issue [1] for XW 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.
>>    To fix WW-1856, we have to upgrade XWork dependency.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the conditions under which this issue shows up are far
>> from rare. Any use of the i18n tag is likely to cause troubles. I can
>> reproduce various cases where a simple POST with an Action.execute()
>> target produces unreadable pages due to inproper text resolving.
>>
>> Therefore I would consider this issue as blocker for making 2.0.7 a GA
>> release. Thoughts?
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Rene
>>
>> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>>
>> Rene Gielen schrieb:
>> > I seem to have the same issue here in a customer project, but since 
>> it is portlet environment, I was not sure yet whether it was a porlet 
>> related issue...
>> >
>> > - Rene
>> >
>> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST), "Rainer Hermanns" 
>> <hermanns@aixcept.de> wrote:
>> >> James,
>> >>
>> >> there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be 
>> related.
>> >> I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
>> >> ASAP with this and other fixes.
>> >>
>> >> +1 for beta
>> >>
>> >> cheers,
>> >> Rainer
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>> >>
>> >>> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
>> >>> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
>> >>> that it's broke.
>> >>>
>> >>> Can someone confirm?
>> >>>
>> >>> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> James Mitchell
>> >>> The Ruby Roundup
>> >>> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>    Release notes:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>        * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>>    Distribution:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>        * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>> >>>>
>> >>>>    The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when
it
>> >>>> is, it will be in the usual location:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>        * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
>> >>>> repository/
>> >>>>
>> >>>>    Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
>> >>>> respond with a vote on its quality:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>    [ ] Leave at test build
>> >>>>    [ ] Alpha
>> >>>>    [ ] Beta
>> >>>>    [ ] General Availability (GA)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>    Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by

>> PMC
>> >>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> >>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>    The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
>> >>>> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or 
>> downgrade the
>> >>>> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial

>> vote
>> >>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> >>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> >>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> >>>> list.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>    As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
>> >>>> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter
is
>> >>>> agreeing to help do the work
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Ted.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message