struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [s1] ActionContext in execute()?
Date Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:47:44 GMT
Since there already has been a lengthy discussion, is anyone interested 
in deciding something?

Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Joe Germuska <joe@germuska.com> wrote:
>>
>> We talked about this at some length when the ActionContext was first
>> introduced.
> 
> 
> IIRC, "at some length" would be a bit of an understatement. ;-) I'm sure
> there are numerous lengthy threads on this subject in the list archives.
> 
> -- 
> Martin Cooper
> 
> 
>  We also talked about having the base action implement
>> ActionCommand and/or some other options.
>>
>> I think the only reason we didn't do it then was because it was still 
>> new,
>> and we thought we'd let it settle in for a while.  In fact, the idea you
>> suggest may at one point have been on the roadmap for 1.4.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> On 3/7/07, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Just gathering some opinions here...
>> >
>> > Would it be preferable to accept an ActionContext in execute() rather
>> > than the 4 parameters?
>> >
>> > public ActionForward execute(ActionContext context) throws Exception;
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Paul
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Joe Germuska
>> Joe@Germuska.com * http://blog.germuska.com
>>
>> "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune."
>> -- Caetano Veloso
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message