From dev-return-53235-apmail-struts-dev-archive=struts.apache.org@struts.apache.org Wed Feb 14 12:34:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69645 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2007 12:34:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2007 12:34:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 79222 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2007 12:34:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 79176 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2007 12:34:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 79163 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2007 12:34:15 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:34:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ted.husted@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.233 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.233] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:34:05 -0800 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so162960nzi for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:33:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Bpk9zS+W2SYBH+3WP6nMCRz/1GA5Exj0pCzhqxGnH+8HxYfXuG4ya4b3KMO0q3F3oSzl4Q9Rl1lf0MFHR+Npc39HDQjpCJ3rvqrRQDOmEmT94UFLRXLc5BuJ8iJXH13Wrfr3UPBQalbrBr4uEkGIb5VHdb6MUvJ7utfN7uSXoKQ= Received: by 10.65.222.11 with SMTP id z11mr3303911qbq.1171456424543; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.98.11 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:33:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8b3ce3790702140433n10a63752mee570309d98aa470@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 07:33:44 -0500 From: "Ted Husted" Sender: ted.husted@gmail.com To: "Struts Developers List" Subject: Re: Users guide In-Reply-To: <74ac90460702140401i4669e295i897bbe1813106bd9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8b3ce3790702120540y2e4103dby404f163ad8feef45@mail.gmail.com> <45D28972.1080805@apache.org> <45D28BBE.4010501@apache.org> <8b3ce3790702140319p1a9b84d5i8c10cfd1e81424f5@mail.gmail.com> <74ac90460702140401i4669e295i897bbe1813106bd9@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4fcf1bf92ff92c43 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I don't have the time to work on a significant refactoring this year. The most I can do is help keep what we have patched and up-to-date. As a PMC member, I would be opposed to any project-sanctioned effort that is going to create a set of redundant documents that would be made part of a release. We have to be very sensitive to the limited time our volunteers have available. We're lucky if we have time to update the project documentation in one place, let alone three or four different places. But, if someone wants to start something on the S2 wiki site (S2WIKI), or in the sandbox, to see if there's traction among other volunteers, the rules of revolution would apply. As to other parts of this thread, I'm not convinced that an XML format would be the best thing for Struts 2. There's a lot to be said for people being able to make changes in real time. With Confluence, anyone with a CLA on file can pitch in and help. (And thanks very much to those that already do!) Without a wiki, we're back to patches that have to applied by committers. Of course, there is a DocBook Wiki, but first we'd have to address the infrastructure issues. Since the Struts 1 project documentation is already in XML, that's "a horse of a different color". -Ted. On 2/14/07, Philip Luppens wrote: > Ok, any chance for a summary with roles on who's going to do what, and > in what timeframe ? > > Although limited in spare time (aren't we all), I'm definitely willing > to work on this (and I assume Musachy as well), but I would appreciate > directions or a concrete plan. > > Shoot. > > Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org