Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15440 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2007 04:03:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2007 04:03:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 10344 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2007 04:03:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 10304 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2007 04:03:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 10293 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2007 04:03:07 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:03:07 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of joegermuska@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.176] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:02:56 -0800 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so501392pyb for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:02:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=rb7ciFC5v2ovbCy5Os5/m5nnHi2LprhNGGTcdEaNNdelbWmfeE6mC2tLm5l8Ld3aOYJr2csO1Sr7Cex7CQRepE8VO7UHkzdHfz3Zlly9ZQQMnvRMg3Vd+dvxXdKZEMmyYhGnKmVWlzP/CfE83puULhNOuhfy40KGazGdmzU3WSM= Received: by 10.35.129.19 with SMTP id g19mr2522780pyn.1168660954812; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:02:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.28.11 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:02:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <242960fe0701122002w3860f925oe2a5f27f2467002a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:02:34 -0600 From: "Joe Germuska" Sender: joegermuska@gmail.com To: "Struts Developers List" Subject: Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib? In-Reply-To: <45A8455F.2060004@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13711_15913084.1168660954242" References: <242960fe0701111119g73db02c5r4fcbb6d78de773@mail.gmail.com> <45A8455F.2060004@apache.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 25ad92ea1a4bf82b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_13711_15913084.1168660954242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 1/12/07, David H. DeWolf wrote: > > I agree that we need to work on simplifying the tags, but I'm not sure > whether or not functions are the way to go. > Well, I'd definitely say that my interest in functions is as much about "hey, don't forget they're out there" as "we really oughta use 'em" -- especially since we resolved one of the questions I had about verbosity. I think people should remember that they are out there. I'm not sure I've found a critical use case for them yet, either in Tiles or in Struts (cf another recent thread) Joe --=20 Joe Germuska Joe@Germuska.com * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from Jo=E3o forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso ------=_Part_13711_15913084.1168660954242--