Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79728 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2006 17:57:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2006 17:57:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 75111 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2006 17:57:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 74457 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2006 17:57:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 74445 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2006 17:57:30 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:57:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [63.246.20.113] (HELO smtp01.opensymphony.com) (63.246.20.113) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:57:28 -0700 Received: (qmail 28816 invoked by uid 89); 4 Aug 2006 17:57:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO opensymphony01.managed.contegix.com) (forum-struts-dev@opensymphony.com@127.0.0.1) by smtp01.opensymphony.com with ESMTPA; 4 Aug 2006 17:57:08 -0000 Message-ID: <24800964.1154714228131.JavaMail.os-j2ee@opensymphony01.managed.contegix.com> Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:56:37 CDT From: Patrick Lightbody Reply-To: dev@struts.apache.org To: dev@struts.apache.org Subject: Re: [s2] Convention over Configuration (was Validation) In-Reply-To: <17831202.1154711869871.JavaMail.os-j2ee@opensymphony01.managed.contegix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Heh - well, that's how this was implemented in the first place. I wrote my own ActionMapper. My point is that I have seen a lot of success with a combination of ActionMapper+Convention-based-configuration, and I think we should really think about pushing this to a broader set of users. I think Don and I agree though - implementing this stuff as wildcards would be very difficult. Our thought instead was to implement it as the recommended approach to get started, but then allow for all the standard overrides via XML that you can do today in WebWork, as well as wildcard support there. Then everyone wins. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=39339&messageID=78166#78166 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org