struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From tm jee <tm_...@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: [s2] Struts 2 Archetype
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2006 05:37:18 GMT

I think it would be more towards starter, i guess. It is runnable and have a simple action
in it with validation and conversion as well. 
  
  rgds.
 
----- Original Message ----
From: Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com>
To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org>
Cc: tmjee@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 6 July, 2006 10:53:55 AM
Subject: Re: [s2] Struts 2 Archetype

On 7/5/06, Ted Husted <husted@apache.org> wrote:

> Yes, I think we should avoid confusion with QuickStart.
>
> I haven't looked at all of these closely yet. Can we go back to
> calling it "blank", or is there already another by that name?

Toby, is the archetype patterned more after the struts2-blank or
struts2-starter app?

Thanks,
-- 
Wendy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org






Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message