Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51201 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2006 04:33:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2006 04:33:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 10937 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 04:33:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 10890 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 04:33:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 10879 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2006 04:33:47 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:33:47 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [206.190.53.32] (HELO smtp107.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.53.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:33:46 -0700 Received: (qmail 45185 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2006 04:33:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.102?) (jmitchtx@69.250.115.202 with plain) by smtp107.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2006 04:33:24 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: <1c661f2f0606131701x6920a7b0r83fde141d76ee216@mail.gmail.com> References: <1c661f2f0606131701x6920a7b0r83fde141d76ee216@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: James Mitchell Subject: Re: Renaming XWork packages (was Poll: What part of a Struts...) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:33:20 -0400 To: "Struts Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N If XWork were at Apache, it's hard to see it as anything but 'org.apache.xwork'. Is that not possible? I think XWork truly deserves to stand on it's own (like it does today) and not be tied to anything else. Surely it can live as a TLP at Apache can it not? -- James Mitchell On Jun 13, 2006, at 8:01 PM, Don Brown wrote: > What about doing what Sun does with Xalan for Java 5 and rename XWork > packages? With the changes we are making to XWork 2.0, I don't think > it will co-exist with WebWork 2.2.2/3 very well, if at all. > > Therefore: > > com.opensymphony.xwork > > will become: > > org.apache.struts.action2.com.opensymphony.xwork or > org.apache.com.opensymphony.xwork or even > org.apache.struts.action2.xwork > > If the new API does its job, XWork should be completely hidden for the > user anyways and for legacy apps, they just need a simple refactoring. > > Don > > On 6/13/06, Alexandru Popescu > wrote: >> Isn't possible to be an issue with XWork dependency? I don't think 2 >> different versions of XWork can co-exist on the same webapp.... but I >> may be wrong. >> >> ./alex >> -- >> .w( the_mindstorm )p. >> >> >> On 6/13/06, Jason Carreira wrote: >> > > Well, it would have made Atlassian's life easier. >> > > JIRA is written with >> > > WW1 and Confluence is written with WW2, the two >> > > versions cannot >> > > coexist in the same web application, and they still >> > > haven't gotten >> > > around to migrating JIRA. When people (like me) run >> > > both applications, >> > > we need to run them as two separate web apps, instead >> > > of two "modules" >> > > that can share session. >> > >> > Not to nitpick, but WW1 and WW2 CAN peacefully coexist, because >> we changed the package names in the change. At Notiva we converted >> the app piecemeal from WW1 to WW2 over time, moving over new >> pieces and migrating anything old that we had to touch. We simply >> mapped them to different extensions. >> > >> > I'm not sure why Atlassian didn't switch over. Maybe it just >> didn't ever make sense. Maybe there was some other issue with >> common configuration files that we didn't run into at Notiva. But >> I can tell you that they can run side-by-side, just as WebWork 2.x >> and Struts 2.x will be able to. >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Posted via Jive Forums >> > http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa? >> threadID=34181&messageID=66503#66503 >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org