struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dakota Jack" <dakota.j...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Action as Struts
Date Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:21:05 GMT
Heh, what about Struts?  That might work?  And, then, like the rest of the
world, you could have versions like 1.* and 2.*, and 3.*.  Oh, that was the
proposal which the newly knighted can't seem to stomach.  Too rational.

On 6/28/06, Paul Benedict <paul4christ79@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I am very much against naming 1.x "Classic" . I think it's a horrible
> name. I think of classical music, classic cars, and anything that smells of
> belonging in a museum (stationary, old, idle, doesn't move, better looked at
> than used). Why do we need it? I am totally fond of action and action2. Why
> does having the departure of Shale instigate nomenclature madness? :-)
> Struts Action Framework is actually a very professional title and I prefer
> we keep it as is.
>
> Ted Husted <ted.husted@gmail.com> wrote: On 6/28/06, Michael
> Jouravlev  wrote:
> > Also, hoping not to hijaack this thread I would suggest coming up with
> > codenames for 1.x and 2.x codebases.
>
> If we were to do that, the obvious choices would be Classic for 1.x
> and Action for 2.x.
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
> countries) for 2ยข/min or less.
>



-- 
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message