struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dakota Jack" <dakota.j...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)
Date Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:45:27 GMT
What is the problem?  Who caused it?  Bingo!  Eureka?

On 6/21/06, Don Brown <mrdon@twdata.org> wrote:
>
> Paul Benedict wrote:
> > I don't see the point in bundling Shale into a "Struts 2.0"
> distribution. No
> > offense to anyone who develops Shale, but when we have packages called
> > "action2", it makes it pretty clear Shale is not Struts 2.0 -- only the
> action
> > framework. Separate frameworks, imo, get different names and
> distributions. I am
> > not offended Shale is within the Struts community, but I do not see it
> as the
> > torch bearer to the name Struts -- I do see that with the AF, which
> historically
> > holds the name.
>
> Again, Struts Action and Struts Shale would both retain their separate
> projects,
> codebases, and release cycles.  Struts 2.0 is about building something on
> top of
> our Struts efforts to create a unified front to users.  Users don't care
> about
> all the little projects, subprojects, and libraries we have; I think they
> just
> want something to help them build webapps - they want Struts 2.0.  And as
> a
> committer, PMC member and Struts user, I want it too.
>
> Don
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>


-- 
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message