struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dakota Jack" <dakota.j...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)
Date Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:39:03 GMT
The success of Spring is not that "people like modularity".

On 6/21/06, Frank W. Zammetti <fzlists@omnytex.com> wrote:
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > So, in addition to including the Action 1.3 JARs in the SAF 2.0
> > release, essentially, you are suggesting that we also include the
> > Shale 1.x JARs in the same distribution, so that anyone obtaining SAF2
> > can use Action 1, Action 2, and/or Shale 1?
>
> Even though Don hasn't answered yet, I have to say I agree with Joe, and
> I hope that wasn't the idea... if we have learned anything from the
> success of Spring, it should be that people like modularity.  Making
> sure that Action 1.3, SAF2 and Shale 1.x can be used together as desired
> is one thing, bundling them all together is another.  I don't think that
> will make things easier or less confusing, on the contrary, I can't
> imagine it would do anything but make people scratch their heads even
> more.
>
> > -Ted.
>
> Frank
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>


-- 
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message