struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Germuska <>
Subject Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)
Date Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:37:31 GMT
At 3:22 PM -0400 6/21/06, Ted Husted wrote:
>On 6/21/06, Don Brown <> wrote:
>>And this is why Shale needs to continue, and I'd argue, continue to exist as
>>part of the larger Struts community, and a step further, under a 
>>larger "Struts
>>2.0" product.  I think despite providing multiple alternatives and solutions,
>>there is a common narrative we can weave to create a unified Struts project.
>So, in addition to including the Action 1.3 JARs in the SAF 2.0
>release, essentially, you are suggesting that we also include the
>Shale 1.x JARs in the same distribution, so that anyone obtaining SAF2
>can use Action 1, Action 2, and/or Shale 1?

I don't like including either Action 1.3 or Shale 1.x in the SAF 2.0 release.

People who need them can get them.


Joe Germuska *    

"You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and
even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed.  Try something new."
	-- Robert Moog

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message