Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-46212-apmail-struts-dev-archive=struts.apache.org@struts.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 49521 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2006 19:15:17 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2006 19:15:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 7520 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2006 19:15:11 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7502 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2006 19:15:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@struts.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@struts.apache.org>
List-Id: "Struts Developers List" <dev.struts.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7491 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2006 19:15:10 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:15:10 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Received: from [206.190.53.28] (HELO smtp103.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com)
 (206.190.53.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:15:09 -0700
Received: (qmail 69733 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2006 19:07:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (jmitchtx@68.209.114.10 with
 plain)
  by smtp103.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2006 19:07:56 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
In-Reply-To: <44412485.60700@twdata.org>
References: <20060415154503.80783.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
 <44412485.60700@twdata.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <3E9E6693-9552-40AC-99E5-0511900B48C9@apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: James Mitchell <jmitchell@apache.org>
Subject: [action2] @author tags -- is removal policy or preference?  [was  Re:
 svn commit: r394308...]
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:07:53 -0400
To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Not sure if this has been discussed yet, but who wants to talk about  
@author tags?

I remember that I wasn't too happy when we removed them years ago,  
but I didn't say anything.  Over time though, I totally get the  
legality of why it has to be done.

Your thoughts?

--
James Mitchell




On Apr 15, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Don Brown wrote:

> Thanks Toby for fixing these tests.  I keep forgetting WebWork,  
> even its tags, are so well unit tested :)
>
> Don
>
> tmjee@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tmjee
>> Date: Sat Apr 15 08:45:00 2006
>> New Revision: 394308
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394308&view=rev
>> Log:
>> - fix failing test case
>> Modified:
>>     incubator/webwork2/action/src/test/java/org/apache/struts/ 
>> action2/views/jsp/ui/FormTagTest.java

<snip/>

>>   *
>>   * @author Jason Carreira
>> - *         Created Apr 3, 2003 10:28:58 AM
>> + * @author tm_jee
>>   *           * @version $Date$ $Id$
>>   */
<snip/>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org