struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Mitchell <jmitch...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [shale] Maven 2 build (was Re: [action1] Which webapp dtds to include in struts-core.jar?)
Date Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:58:00 GMT
We should probably do this over in a test repository and make sure it  
will do what we want.  Similar to what was done for MyFaces and Action1.

Your thoughts?

--
James Mitchell




On Apr 19, 2006, at 10:35 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:

> I'd love to see Shale move to M2.  I'll try to help with the limited
> Maven knowledge that I have gleaned from the MyFaces experience.  I'd
> recommend starting out with a proposed hierarchy and set of artifiacts
> as a starting point.  See if we can get the basics squared away first
> before sweating the javadocs.
>
> Sean
>
> On 4/15/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 4/15/06, Brett Porter <brett.porter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> are the apis with the other javadoc going to be in a separate  
>>> module?
>>> This should make it easy to produce javadoc from there, and then  
>>> go on
>>> to produce the aggregated javadoc for the others.
>>
>>
>> Ideally not.  It's already going to be painful to split up the  
>> core-library
>> package (which now produces several JAR files) into separate  
>> modules solely
>> because Maven likes one artifact per module.
>>
>> Shale publishes information on API stability (
>> http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/api-stability.html) that  
>> also includes
>> a column describing who should be using the APIs in each package ...
>> application developers or those wanting to extend the framework.   
>> That is
>> the basis on which I would want to split the javadocs, but they  
>> would also
>> be based on combining back together all the application-related  
>> APIs and all
>> the framework-related APIs back together again.
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/15/06, James Mitchell <jmitchell@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Craig wrote
>>>>>> I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of
>>>>>> these artifacts (although probably two sets ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we do this with custom assemblies?
>>>>
>>>> Without trying it, I don't think so, because it's more than just
>>>> copying files around.  The Javadoc tool needs to create the  
>>>> frames and
>>>> indexes so that everything is linked together.
>>>>
>>>> I think it will need two <reportSet>s, so the Javadoc plugin runs
>>>> twice with different configuration.  Maybe something like this,  
>>>> which
>>>> runs both the regular Javadoc doclet and the UMLGraph one:
>>>>    http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UMLGraph
>>>>
>>>> And here's a link to some work that I did last year, which includes
>>>> pom.xml files and a script to rearrange Shale into Maven 2's  
>>>> preferred
>>>> structure.  I stopped in late November, so it doesn't include Shale
>>>> Tiger or anything after that.
>>>>    http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ShaleMaven2#build
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Wendy
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message