Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86694 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2006 10:21:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2006 10:21:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 31984 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2006 10:21:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 31936 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2006 10:21:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 31925 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2006 10:21:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:21:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:21:52 -0800 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x4so779037nfb for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:21:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=W+qjII5DospumvV1i05M752oGFKXe2YKDZy2tDOCSwp2yk0kcVkz/Me9DJ31YcvZDVnC0CKLhfdExFcLavKflA90XnQWI/kHNRASIRMfJ4UYSNkeQneNgCsYaNK5CqBVH6gpmEQ+cwOHzUg5laROg08j+mHyCZTMhiZrnBAT+QY= Received: by 10.48.205.19 with SMTP id c19mr685793nfg; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:21:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.61.1 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:21:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:21:30 +0200 From: "Alexandru Popescu" To: "Struts Developers List" Subject: Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised* In-Reply-To: <52026.80.137.113.131.1143274662.squirrel@strato.aixcept.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2814_4869588.1143282090615" References: <442440E6.1020307@twdata.org> <44249440.7040703@twdata.org> <52026.80.137.113.131.1143274662.squirrel@strato.aixcept.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_2814_4869588.1143282090615 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline IMO we should keep the names as consistent as possible so my vote would go for: - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.action2 - WebWork* classes -> Struts* - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. - ww: tag prefix -> a:/saf: so pretty much as Rainer's vote. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. On 3/25/06, Rainer Hermanns wrote: > > Don, > > I think using Struts Ti on the one hand and Struts Action 2 on the other > as a name will lead to some confusion. Ti as a codename is great, but for > the codebase I would prefer Action2. > > > - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.ti > > - WebWork* classes -> Struts* > > - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 > > - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. > > - ww: tag prefix -> a: > > +1 for this proposal but with package name 'org.apache.struts.action2' > +1 for either a: or saf: > > cheers, > Rainer > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org > > ------=_Part_2814_4869588.1143282090615--