Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16922 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 20:12:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 20:12:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 89781 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2006 20:12:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 89682 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2006 20:12:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 89637 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2006 20:12:10 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:12:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jak-struts-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:12:07 -0800 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FABx9-000381-AM for dev@struts.apache.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:11:43 +0100 Received: from cpe00045ad20d9e-cm0011e6f60f1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([70.25.230.197]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:11:43 +0100 Received: from laurie by cpe00045ad20d9e-cm0011e6f60f1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:11:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@struts.apache.org From: Laurie Harper Subject: Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:11:22 -0500 Lines: 62 Message-ID: References: <8b3ce3790511211818p7143385aw5f6cd417ed13daf7@mail.gmail.com> <55afdc850602160645g22e26b16p28f309cd06ecb90e@mail.gmail.com> <8b3ce3790602160751p22936d76o4b2edc1e1ca4d48d@mail.gmail.com> <55afdc850602160814p48dd010aw5e6ef2795c45fa02@mail.gmail.com> <8b3ce3790602161639p4043f131sd285d753d5bec7c6@mail.gmail.com> <8b3ce3790602170645s38de056cp6f589372b1108e76@mail.gmail.com> <8b3ce3790602170953m7d708b17rc0fb071a20747db0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe00045ad20d9e-cm0011e6f60f1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) In-Reply-To: <8b3ce3790602170953m7d708b17rc0fb071a20747db0@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Another way of looking at it is that such a tag would be capturing the same information as the Maven POM... The main value of a tag is to allow someone to check out all the code for a given release at once. Checking out just action and letting Maven pull the release jars for the other sub-projects gets you there anyway IMHO. L. Ted Husted wrote: > Did we tag current for the Struts-Shale_1.0.0 and > Struts-Scripting_1.0.0 releases? > > For the Action Library, right now, I'm only planning to post the JARs > (including external dependencies), which are all self-tagged for the > appropriate release. > > Conceptually, I'm thinking of the Library as the set of Struts GA > releases that are dependant on Action and work with a given Action GA. > (So, technically, right now, that's a null set, since we have no GA > releases, but we should at least prime the pump. ) > > In the future, if we wanted to a tag for that set, we might have to > use a "working copy" tag, since it probably would not be a tag against > the HEAD, but against some GA tag for each of the different > subprojects. It would be a mix of revisions. > > * http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch04s06.html#svn-ch-4-sect-6.2 > > Though, the Action Library release manager would not need to obtain > the set of source file as a matter of course. No more than we need to > obtain the source for a Commons JAR. The release manager for an Action > Library would only need to test the JARs already decreed GA, the same > as we do for Commons JARs. > > My question would be whether we are going to expect an Action Library > release manager to go through the work of making a complex tag? > > If someone wants to check-out the Struts source for each of the JARs > and create the tag, that's great, and it would be a good idea to have > a cannonical place to put such a tag. But being a release manager is > hard enough without making work. If someone needs the set, the set is > obtainable. If we need it, then we can create it when we need it, and > save it somewhere so someone doesn't need to create it again. But > creating it up front seems like busy-work. > > -Ted. > > On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak wrote: >> On 2/17/06, James Mitchell wrote: >> >>> Did we tag every subproject? Including 'current'? Maybe I just >>> missed it. >> I didn't see a tag for current... but there is no trunk/branches/tags >> directory structure there, either. >> >> It seems to me that we need a tag for (something like) >> ACTION-LIB_1.3_00, so you can grab all the "right" versions of the >> sub-projects that go with a particular library distribution. These >> are the ones we've tested to make sure they work together. I'm just >> not sure where to put it. What about in struts/action/tags or just >> struts/tags ? Current doesn't seem like the right place, no one would >> go looking in "current" for an old release. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org