Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18686 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2005 16:09:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Nov 2005 16:09:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 99417 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2005 16:08:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 99388 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2005 16:08:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 99370 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2005 16:08:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:08:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ted.husted@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.200 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.200] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:10:21 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i1so473945nzh for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:08:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BDk1EoQjFfT+lz93NetXWnJpjiz5jA+shIPAKH9F0fx8T0ih3hOMBG6Ll0wCtJIHFH3RNmUBaEWFajV2o/uSyglnClS1B3JmbFgY3H2KBSgIvCA+r1TSj3pl/mpUcaq0rlYKwiXjfRyTSU83YZkRPmHTYNV2GdMKiI7EBf2RBH4= Received: by 10.36.91.6 with SMTP id o6mr1822384nzb; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:08:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.90.19 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:08:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8b3ce3790511260808p1fddd839lad7a4abf953ac4f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 11:08:29 -0500 From: Ted Husted Reply-To: husted@apache.org To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT][shale] Struts Shale 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1 Available In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm not sure if I'm comfortable with going back to using the "release candidate" nomenclature. If we want to release a distribution, we should vote on the plan, and release a distribution. If that distribution needs work to make the GA grade, then we should just release the next milestone. We worked very hard to develop a canonical release process, which I believe is serving us well. If we anticipate that a 1.0.0 release will be soon followed by a 1.0.1, then I would suggest setting up a release plan for the subsequent release too. There's no reason why we can't use the canonical process to release early and release often. Since the release process is already streamlined, I don't think that hosting "release candidates" and "limited time distributions" on top of the nightly builds is a good idea. I am also very uncomforable with us rolling any type of distribution and announcing it to the *user* list, without (as far as I can tell) any prior discussion on dev@. There are several Shale committers in our community, and I believe everyone involved should be given the express opportunity to chime-in before we do anything like this. -Ted. On 11/25/05, Craig McClanahan wrote: > In preparation for the initial milestone release of Struts Shale 1.0.0, a > release candidate has been made available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~craigmcc/struts-shale-1.0.0-rc1/ > (TIME LIMITED URL) > > including both tar.gz and zip artifacts (containing both binary and sourc= e), > and an extracted copy of the release notes. Please help ensure the corre= ct > assembly and quality of this release by downloading it, and ensuring that= it > works correctly for you. > > Struts Shale 1.0.0 is intended to be an initial test build of the new > framework (see for more > information). It is not intended that this release be subsequently voted= on > as candidate for General Availability. Instead, it should be considered = an > alpha milestone, released in order to provide opportunities for wider > testing. Expect to see subsequent point releases of increasing quality a= nd > functionality. > > Even though this is considered a test build, various developer APIs shoul= d > be considered at a more stable (in terms of assurances of backwards > compatibility in future releases) point than might otherwise be expected = of > an alpha release. Please see the following web page for more details: > > http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/api-stability.html > > Feedback welcome! > > Craig McClanahan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org