Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36794]  -
    Enhance DynaActionForm and sub-classes to allow normal property access in
 JSPs
Message-Id: <20050930124858.862A8E0@ajax.apache.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:48:58 +0200 (CEST)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36794>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36794


------- Additional Comments From Joe@Germuska.com  2005-09-30 14:48 -------
Just a thought: would it make more sense to implement this as a separate class,
as in CGDynaActionForm ?

My understanding is that almost everything that can be done with Commons
BeanUtils classes can also be done with CGLib, and in many cases, can be done
better.  Maybe it makes more sense to start a parallel course which has no
dependencies on commons-beanutils?

This would also eliminate any of the compatibility concerns you mentioned on the
mailing list.

At this time, I wouldn't veto changing DynaActionForm, but I wanted to raise
this as an idea.  

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org