Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of craigmcc@gmail.com designates
 64.233.170.195 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=bxJEBbBK2rG3U/zNDsh8bSXW64U1hJHLAptaks6NEV/ldVHG7Td1CJVEfRCjSKK4EIasM8K91/3zOEi+O5FMX6g90NAtwx4LTI9cQYqEftNutw1GRRNA7p5/wdF0AC8sDYKEpNP8mA5CWDB/WcB2BqecOOob7HT/QhxgiRKQkaM=
Message-ID: <f8b39ace050711204765df42f8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:47:24 -0700
From: Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@gmail.com>
Reply-To: craigmcc@apache.org
To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org>,
	Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles
In-Reply-To: <2387fbc505071120137980426d@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <0b4e01c5868e$762fcf90$6a02a8c0@compaq>
	 <2387fbc505071120137980426d@mail.gmail.com>

On 7/11/05, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe the version under sandbox is the standalone Tiles that David
> Geary just finished.  I haven't been following the discussions as to
> where it should go, but that is what it is.  I built it and used with
> Shale.  Looks good.

This (sandbox/tiles) is indeed the version that is independent of the
Struts core.  Martin pointed out a bunch of TODOs in a previous thread
that still need to be dealt with (including applying some patches that
went in to the 1.2 version of Tiles that is integrated with Struts),
and there are likely some additional issues yet to be discovered, but
this code does indeed work without Struts 1.x in the classpath.

Craig

>=20
> sean
>=20
> On 7/11/05, James Mitchell <jmitchell@apache.org> wrote:
> > Sorry if I've been out of the loop.
> >
> > What's going on with Tiles under sandbox/trunk?  Last I heard, we were =
going
> > to change Tiles (HEAD) to be free of it's dependency on Struts.  What i=
s
> > under the sandbox?  It seems like a modification based off of some old
> > version of Tiles.  Am I missing something?
> >
> >
> > --
> > James Mitchell
> > Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> > Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
> > EdgeTech, Inc.
> > http://www.edgetechservices.net/
> > 678.910.8017
> > AIM:   jmitchtx
> > MSN:   jmitchell@apache.org
> > Skype: jmitchtx
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>=20
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org