Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-31836-apmail-struts-dev-archive=struts.apache.org@struts.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81692 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2005 21:12:02 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 21:12:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 35150 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2005 21:11:05 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35114 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2005 21:11:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@struts.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@struts.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@struts.apache.org>
List-Id: "Struts Developers List" <dev.struts.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35088 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2005 21:11:04 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from bugs.merck.com (HELO usryim05.merck.com) (155.91.6.30)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:11:02 -0800
Received: from 155.91.2.6 by usryim05.merck.com with ESMTP (SMTP Relay);
 Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:10:49 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: C1B20895-5F37-4891-AEC4-0F65038F676D
Received: from 54.3.102.168 by usrytw30.merck.com with ESMTP (Tumbleweed
 MMS SMTP Relay (MMS v5.6.1)); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:10:42 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: B5919EAF-A2A1-4341-8146-0723675D9780
Received: by usrygw31.merck.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
 id <DR4ZYSGX>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:10:42 -0500
Message-ID: <241F3F05CDE1A646AA973346D7629ED305183AAD@uswpmx13.merck.com>
From: "Benedict, Paul C" <paul_benedict@merck.com>
To: "'dev@struts.apache.org'" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Subject: Struts 1.3: Validations and Commands
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:10:38 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
X-WSS-ID: 6DE6D8D81QS64624623-01-01
X-WSS-ID: 6DE6D8D312S957439-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Is it the intention of Struts 1.3 to run ExecuteCommand regardless of
validation failure? Looking at the commands listed in chain-config.xml,
neither AbstractValidateActionForm or AbstractSelectInput return true if
validation failed.

I am curious about this design decision. If validation fails, what use is
executing the command?

Thanks,
Paul



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message.  If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org