Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50590 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 12:48:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 12:48:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 78778 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2005 12:48:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 78740 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2005 12:48:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 78725 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2005 12:48:26 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 04:48:25 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j07CmNUC020624 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:48:23 +0100 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j07CmMpl020622; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:48:22 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:48:22 +0100 Message-Id: <200501071248.j07CmMpl020622@ajax.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@struts.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27239] - bug in X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27239 ------- Additional Comments From valtoni@prodepa.gov.br 2005-01-07 13:48 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > I don't understand why you would specify "dynamicJavascript='true'" for a form that doesn't exist. > > Joe - I'm not trying to say that my code is right. All I'm saying is the way the taglib handles a missing > form has changed since 1.1. In 1.1, the taglib would gracefully ignore the error - and the user would > have no issues. > > I'm fine with using the *new* way, I just think it needs to be well documented. Do you put the plugin validator in struts-config? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org