Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78762 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2004 04:54:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2004 04:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 99416 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2004 04:54:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 99386 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2004 04:54:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 99372 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2004 04:54:06 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.18.33.10] (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:54:05 -0700 Received: (qmail 1645 invoked by uid 50); 28 Oct 2004 04:56:08 -0000 Date: 28 Oct 2004 04:56:08 -0000 Message-ID: <20041028045608.1644.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@struts.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor() X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31731 ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor() ------- Additional Comments From dgraham@apache.org 2004-10-28 04:56 ------- I just want to point out that we have been bitten by BEA defects before and closing this as WONTFIX is appropriate IMO. In the past we modified how we formatted our MANIFEST.MF class path entries from the standard to something BEA would parse correctly. Then we got new bugs from folks using Tomcat which tries to parse the file according to the standard and failed due to our non-standard changes to accomodate BEA. We reverted back to the standard and let BEA fix their bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org