Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-27040-apmail-struts-dev-archive=struts.apache.org@struts.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17641 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2004 18:21:34 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 2004 18:21:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 52089 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2004 18:21:20 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51775 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2004 18:21:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@struts.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@struts.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@struts.apache.org>
List-Id: "Struts Developers List" <dev.struts.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51477 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2004 18:21:11 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [216.148.227.85] (HELO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) (216.148.227.85)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:21:11 -0700
Received: from ny-exchange.koplik.com
 (pcp09802489pcs.union01.nj.comcast.net[68.39.74.78])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
          id <20040623182044014001h64te>; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:20:44 +0000
Received: by NY_EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <JTXGLA2B>; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:09:56 -0400
Message-ID: <7ABB3A4D66B4D511870E00B0D0F917E07D82AE@NY_EXCHANGE>
From: Edgar P Dollin <edgar@blue-moose.net>
To: 'Struts Developers List' <dev@struts.apache.org>
Subject: RE: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for submitt
	 ing
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:09:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


> This contradicts point 1.  If using JSTL tags is a waste of time, so is
> using Struts tags.

Absolutely not.  There is no logic in the view layer of the struts tags.
JSTL assumes you have to put the object in the scope, know something about
it in order to traverse it etc.


> If you want your site to only work in IE, that's fine with me.  Expecting
> a widely used library like Struts to support that behavior is rediculous. 
> I have absolutely no interest in writing/maintaining code that only
> supports one OS and browser.

> David

I always cross test, that is not the point.  The point is to be able
without, jumping through hoops, to be able to use standard software to solve
a specific problem.

Edgar

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org