struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Sundling <tomcatl...@tkz.net>
Subject Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26077] - Checkstyle reports -Licenses incorrect
Date Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:36:15 GMT
First of all, it's done (other than 4 files), touching about 470 source 
files.  It's not just formatting, but making it mostly consistent.  The 
dates have to be left inconsistent and everything else made consistent.  
Even if that's a good approach, why redo it again?

Maybe that can be used for the tabs issue.  There's already a bunch of 
other solutions proposed on that one.  If jalopy is made to format code 
to a specification and CheckStyle is to check if you formatted code to a 
spec, why not combine the tools.  It could be like fsck, where it comes 
across errors and then you just choose Y and it fixes the problem for 
you.  :) 

Paul

bugzilla@apache.org wrote:

>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
><http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26077>.
>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26077
>
>Checkstyle reports -Licenses incorrect
>
>
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From tchen@tampabay.rr.com  2004-01-13 00:36 -------
>What's the difference between this and doing
>  maven jalopy:format?
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>  
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message