Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-struts-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 70721 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 13:15:25 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 13:15:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 7028 invoked by uid 97); 4 Jun 2003 13:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-struts-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 7021 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 13:17:39 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 13:17:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 69908 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2003 13:15:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 69896 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 13:15:15 -0000 Received: from s-97-26.dsl.cleardatavoice.com (HELO gridnode.com) (202.83.97.26) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 13:15:15 -0000 Received: from andrew (pc209 [192.168.213.209]) by gridnode.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with SMTP id h54DMsE17696 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:22:56 +0800 Reply-To: From: "Andrew Hill" To: "Struts Developers List" Subject: RE: composable RequestProcessor Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:14:41 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3EDDEFCB.5000002@livinglogic.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Just had a look at the updated wiki. Is it just me lacking sleep or are the contents for the singleInterface page and the composableRequestprocessor page kindof in the wrong places? (ie the stuff for composable on the single page and vice versa) -----Original Message----- From: Matthias Bauer [mailto:Matthias.Bauer@livinglogic.de] Sent: Wednesday, 4 June 2003 21:11 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: composable RequestProcessor > I just made some more changes to the Wiki to try to point out the lack > of consensus on this issue. (Until this morning it said people felt > one way, and Ted just wrote a pretty good argument for thinking about > it another way.) This is right. Before Ted's mail I was pretty sure, that the idea of a composable request processor is much too difficult to implement. But Ted really made a very good point. Unfortunately I did not have the time yet to think it through in detail and look more thouroughly in the code. > > I strongly encourage people who are really thinking about this to > review the Wiki pages, to make sure I haven't gotten anything wrong, > and to potentially add your ideas there as well as in the mailing list. I am afraid that nobody will notice, when someone changes/adds the wiki content. When I receive a mail with this subject, I am reminded that someone makes a new point. Therefore, mailing seems more straightforward to me at this point in time. > Maybe it's just me, but message-by-message design makes my head spin. > It needs to be collected somewhere. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/apachewiki?RequestProcessor I think the correct URL is: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?RequestProcessor --- Matthias --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org