struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Husted <hus...@apache.org>
Subject Re: composable RequestProcessor
Date Tue, 03 Jun 2003 17:15:36 GMT
Gary D Ashley Jr. wrote:
 > First,
 > If the TilesRequestProcessor were to be integrated into
 > RequestProcessor, and made to play nice when not using Tiles, that
 > would at least remove one obstacle when trying to extend the request
 > processor.  Since Tiles seems tobe a core struts component now, would
 > that make since?  Or should Tiles still considered an extension?

Both Tiles and the Validator should be considered "standard extensions".

Keeping them as exensions means that we have a "case in point" proving 
the extensibility of Struts.

In other words, if the model works for Tiles as an extension, it should 
work for anything =:0)

-Ted.





-- 
Ted Husted,
Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message