Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-struts-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 98679 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 04:42:17 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2003 04:42:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 13476 invoked by uid 97); 9 May 2003 04:44:31 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-struts-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 13469 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 04:44:30 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 9 May 2003 04:44:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 97846 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2003 04:42:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 97835 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 04:42:09 -0000 Received: from web41502.mail.yahoo.com (66.218.93.85) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2003 04:42:09 -0000 Message-ID: <20030509044220.96300.qmail@web41502.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.161.74.172] by web41502.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 May 2003 21:42:20 PDT Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 21:42:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Mohan Kishore Subject: Re: Yes, it's another VOTE: RELEASE STRUTS 1.1 WITH DBCP NIGHTLY BUILD To: Struts Developers List In-Reply-To: <20030508201838.G97499@icarus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > On Thu, 8 May 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > > So, by retrofitting the old GDS and adding the new 1.4 Connection > > signatures as "UnsupportedOperation", she compiles under 1.4 but > > *without* Commons-DBCP and Commons-Pool. > > As soon as you try this, you're going to discover a very unpleasant fact > -- you cannot create a single source file of a class that implements > java.sql.Connection that compiles under both JDK < 1.4 and JDK >= 1.4. If > you want to see the world's worst hack to get around this, take a look at > the commons-dbcp source code and the associated build script. > > Such a class compiled under 1.4 will *run* on a < 1.4 platform (as long as > you don't reference the new methods that deal with a Savepoint). But we'd > have to accept a restriction that you can only compile Struts on a 1.4 or > later platform. That wouldn't bother me personally (I use 1.4 > exclusively) but I suspect it would bother more than a few users. Believe can work out an alternate resolution using a dynamic proxy - but most probably would have performance impact... Do you think its worth the effort..? regards, Mohan. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org