struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Cooper <mart...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Declare Struts 1.1b3 as Struts 1.1 RC1
Date Mon, 20 Jan 2003 06:11:32 GMT


On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, V. Cekvenich wrote:

> Ahh.... how hard is to release a nightly + 8 bugs as a RCx first or
> rename B3 as RC1?

Perhaps surprisingly, other than fixing the 8 bugs, there really isn't
that much difference. Renaming B3 to RC1 sounds simple, but in practice,
it requires a fair amount of work.

One day, I'll finish writing up the Struts release process, so that others
can step up to the plate and know what they need to do. The trick is that
I have to write it up in such a way as to encourage people to take it on,
rather than scare them away... ;-)

--
Martin Cooper


>
> I (and I suspect some other users) did not treat the B3 as I should.
> This kind of says to users its going out, and they have only a short
> time to test their apps. Normaly I test fast, but I did not test B3
> (with clients apps or basicPortal, they both use a lot of areas of
> Struts together). Of course if a few of you tested, cool with me.
>
> Vic
>
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > I'm sure that as soon as the eight remaining issues are duly cleared,
> > Martin would be happy to a cut a beta 4.
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&bugidtype=include&bug_id=15736%2C16019%2C11021%2C15044%2C15799%2C15883%2C15913%2C16073%2C15816%2C15912%2C15916%2C15935%2C15969%2C16067%2C16104%2C16207&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&product=Struts&version=1.1+Beta+3&short_desc=&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&keywords=&keywords_type=anywords&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&cmdtype=doit&newqueryname=&order=reuse+last+sort
> >
> >
> > If that looks good, any of us could then suggest converting the beta 4
> > to a release candidate or even the final release. (And I would favor the
> > latter.)
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > James Turner wrote:
> >
> >>> From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, January 19,
> >>> 2003 5:19 PM
> >>> To: Struts Developers List
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Declare Struts 1.1b3 as Struts 1.1 RC1
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>> So, I'd say lets cut to the chase. Do B4, and if it's good, let's
> >>> just go with it. If the fence sitters come up with anything once
> >>> final ships, we go with an early Struts 1.1.1. Let's get the momentum
> >>> up, and trust ourselves to do the right thing when the time comes.
> >>>
> >>> -Ted.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Fine with me either way.  I just wanna ship da puppy. You wanna run the
> >> vote? :-) I'm looking at 15044 as we speak.
> >>
> >> James
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> <mailto:struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message