struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig R. McClanahan" <craig...@apache.org>
Subject Re: LogFactory compile error with Commons Logging 1.0.2
Date Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:06:39 GMT


On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote:

> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:46:54 -0500
> From: Ted Husted <husted@apache.org>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> To: Struts Developers List <struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: LogFactory compile error with Commons Logging 1.0.2
>
> Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 13:47:55 -0800 (PST)
> >>From: Martin Cooper <martinc@apache.org>
> >>Reply-To: Struts Developers List <struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> >>To: Struts Developers List <struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> >>Subject: Re: LogFactory compile error with Commons Logging 1.0.2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>What about DBCP?
> >>
> >>I know there have been quite a few changes in DBCP since its 1.0 release.
> >>I don't really track DBCP, so I don't know how much is bug fixes versus
> >>other changes (like incorporating jdbc2pool), but I think it's likely that
> >>we'll want a DBCP 1.1 for Struts 1.1 Final.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Yep.
>
>
> So, should we be specifying the DBCP Nightly Build now, or is 1.0
> sufficient?
>

We want to say "latest nightly build" for now.

It looks like Martin tagged the commons libraries he pulled with
(STRUTS_1_1_B3), as I suggested.  So 1.1-b3 users will be able to see
exactly what code was included.

> -Ted.

Craig



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message