Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-struts-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 61205 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 09:47:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2002 09:47:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 18588 invoked by uid 97); 5 Sep 2002 09:47:50 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18569 invoked by uid 97); 5 Sep 2002 09:47:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18505 invoked by uid 98); 5 Sep 2002 09:47:48 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <3D772825.30307@apache.org> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 05:47:17 -0400 From: Ted Husted User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Struts-EL: Status and moving forward References: <86lm6hdm38.fsf@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N If you're ready to offer it to the project, ZIP it up as a distribution that we can download from somewhere and post it as an enhancement to bugzilla. Then we can have a look and decide about importing it into the Struts CVS. If you'd like to kick it around some more first, instead of posting to bugzilla, post an ANNOUNCEMENT to the user list. In either case, I'd be happy to help out with the JavaDoc, so you don't have to get bogged down in that. -Ted. David M. Karr wrote: > I've gotten to the point with my Struts-EL contribution that I'd like some > advice on how I can move forward with finalizing this. > > I've finished the code for all the tags, except I have to put in any required > standard headers and add javadoc (and I'd like to know what is really needed > here, from a Jakarta policy point of view), although there's really not much to > the code that is novel at all. With some work (including an extension or two > to the taglib XML descriptor), the code for the tags could be generated. The > only tag where I've added (none removed) an attribute is the "logic-el:match" > tag, where I've added an "expr" attribute, to take an EL value, as opposed to > getting the value to compare from a cookie, header, bean property, or request > parameter. > > I've finished converting all the original pages from the "exercise-taglib", and > I've added one other, and added a "Show Source" feature for all the tests. > > I've built a set of Cactus unit tests, covering many of the tags, but there's > still quite a few which haven't been covered yet (the original Struts tests > hardly cover any). > > I'm almost done with writing a README file that explains the purpose of the > library, and details some of the "porting decisions", which is a list of the > original Struts tags which I did NOT port to Struts-EL (because JSTL covers > their functionality). > > My current work isn't in CVS, and is based on the 1.1-b2 code base. > > I'd like to get this "out there" in the hands of people who can use it, and who > can help to evolve it forward. > > Advice? Help? Direction? > > -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY US co-author, Java Web Development with Struts Order it today: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: