struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Husted <>
Subject Re: /contrib
Date Sat, 07 Jul 2001 20:41:04 GMT
David Winterfeldt wrote:
> I don't know.  I could go either way.  I think it
> makes sense having the ValidatorForm in
> org.apache.struts.action.  

+1 on org.apache.struts.action if that's what you want to do.

> Are there any issues with breaking backwards
> compatibility?  I'm for replacing the validator
> version for the current since iterating throught the
> errors further encourages formatting to be in the
> view.  If we do replace the old tag, would it still be
> somewhere for people to access the old tag that
> migrate from Struts 1.0 to Struts 1.1?  Possibly
> called html:errorsOld or old-html:errors.  Or the new
> one could be html:errorsIterator.

Craig setup a 1.1 DTD so we could make changes there without affecting
the 1.0 users. I guess we need a similar strategy for the taglibs
themselves. If we made the old taglib available as struts-html-10, then
they could keep compatible just by changing the web.xml reference, or


View raw message