streams-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Reactive Streams API and Java 9
Date Fri, 26 Jan 2018 00:43:10 GMT
+1. Makes a ton of sense.

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:05 PM Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 to move to Java 9
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Steve Blackmon <sblackmon@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> >  Hello,
> >
> > There have been a few threads going back several years about whether we
> > could align Apache Streams components to the Reactive Streams
> > specification.
> >
> > This came back to me last night when I read that Reactive Streams
> > interfaces are built into Java 9, along with new classes under
> > java.util.concurrent that facilitate connecting publishers and
> subscribers
> > and handle message passing between them within a JVM.
> >
> > Wanted to bring this up on the list to find out if anyone would be
> > interested in working on a proof-of-concept adapting a provider to use
> > these new capabilities instead of or in addition to the interfaces in
> > streams-core, and all of that providers tests to remove the dependency on
> > streams-runtime-local that I think we’ve established consensus that we
> want
> > to deprecate.
> >
> > Also, to find out whether anyone is fundamentally opposed to switching
> to a
> > strict Java 9 dependency in Apache Streams, before spending significant
> > time working on this.  As context, Oracle has announced that maintenance
> > releases for Java 8 will cease in September 2018.
> >
> > sblackmon@apache.org
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message