streams-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joey Frazee <joey.fra...@icloud.com>
Subject Re: {VOTE} move to gitbox
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:35:16 GMT
+1

We already do the code reviews and PRs almost entirely on Github and probably some of us use
the sync'd Github repo for our upstream remote and not Apache so this will cut out some fat.

> On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:35 PM, Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2017-07-05 22:16, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2017-07-05 20:31, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Hmm, just checked their mailinglists and only found one single thread
>>>> voting
>>>> on that move, again without *any* context.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9b
>>> 205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E
>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9
>>> b205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E>
>>> 
>>> 
>> Yes, that's the one single thread I could find.
>> But no argument or context there either.
>> Maybe everyone voting on this at openNLP already knows everything about
>> gitbox,
>> or they just voted blindly, hoping for the best?
>> 
>> I'm happy to vote on this, but I'm still clueless for what.
> 
> 
> With the present setup (without gitbox): this is how u have to merge the
> PRs (the cumbersome, manual way) -
> http://mahout.apache.org/developers/github.html
> 
> With gitbox setup, this is how u do it (the way its supposed to be, see the
> section merging a Pull Request) - http://opennlp.apache.org/using-git.html
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If anything, it greatly simplifies committer workflow as Steve's
>>>>> mentioned
>>>>> before.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> How, in which way?
>>>> Sure, I get github and git in general, but I cannot find *any*
>>>> explanation
>>>> or documentation concerning gitbox.
>>>> 
>>>> I won't, can't really, vote positively on this without some context.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2017-07-05 19:22, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is a vote to move all streams repos to Gitbox, some of the other
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> projects have started to move their repos to gitbox.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This was discussed before, and while I probably will be +1,
>>>>>> I'm still clueless what gitbox provides, allows, enabled and what
>>>>>> restrictions/limitations it imposes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> While I suppose it to be 'cool' and 'it'll be great', as (P)PMC we
>>>>>> should *know* what we're getting (or accepting) by moving to gitbox,
>>>>>> *before* deciding.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Here's my +1 binding.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This vote will close in 72 hrs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Mime
View raw message