streams-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
Subject Re: {VOTE} move to gitbox
Date Wed, 05 Jul 2017 20:16:42 GMT
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu> wrote:

> On 2017-07-05 20:31, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
>> Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox.
>>
>
> Hmm, just checked their mailinglists and only found one single thread
> voting
> on that move, again without *any* context.


https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9b205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E
<https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9b205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E>

>
>
>
>> If anything, it greatly simplifies committer workflow as Steve's mentioned
>> before.
>>
>
> How, in which way?
> Sure, I get github and git in general, but I cannot find *any* explanation
> or documentation concerning gitbox.
>
> I won't, can't really, vote positively on this without some context.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu> wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-07-05 19:22, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a vote to move all streams repos to Gitbox, some of the other
>>>> projects have started to move their repos to gitbox.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This was discussed before, and while I probably will be +1,
>>> I'm still clueless what gitbox provides, allows, enabled and what
>>> restrictions/limitations it imposes.
>>>
>>> While I suppose it to be 'cool' and 'it'll be great', as (P)PMC we
>>> should *know* what we're getting (or accepting) by moving to gitbox,
>>> *before* deciding.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's my +1 binding.
>>>>
>>>> This vote will close in 72 hrs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message