Mailing-List: contact dev-help@streams.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@streams.incubator.apache.org
From: Joey Frazee <joey.frazee@icloud.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopt gitbox
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 12:17:46 -0400
References: <etPan.591b4781.69c39edc.33fc@apache.org>
To: dev@streams.incubator.apache.org
In-reply-to: <etPan.591b4781.69c39edc.33fc@apache.org>
Message-id: <6EE55187-6E70-4821-96DA-05AE2A19D708@icloud.com>
archived-at: Wed, 17 May 2017 16:18:06 -0000

How does gitbox fit into this? I=E2=80=99m totally on board with =
changing the origins so that the PR merges can be done directly from =
Github, but I don=E2=80=99t know if I understand the gitbox part.

> On May 16, 2017, at 2:40 PM, sblackmon <sblackmon@apache.org> wrote:
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> I learned this afternoon that infra now supports transitioning to a =
git setup, gitbox, capable of more native integration with github, =
including the ability to merge pull requests from within the github UI.
>=20
> My understanding is we just need to ask to go through this transition. =
 We=E2=80=99d all need to change our origin to the new url, but =
otherwise there should be no downside to the swap.
>=20
> Does anyone know of a reason not to do this?  Or want to express =
support in favor?
>=20
> Steve
>=20