streams-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] interest in maintaining streams-runtime-pig?
Date Sun, 04 Dec 2016 22:29:30 GMT
+1

Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org

*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*


On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 4:16 PM, sblackmon <sblackmon@apache.org> wrote:

> Let’s keep to our plan to close STREAMS-155 in the 0.5-incubating
> release.  It’s come up in now twice during IPMC reviews.
>
> If someone wants to put up a pull request covering streams-runtime-pig
> that switches from cdh to apache official dependencies and keeps all the
> test passing in the several weeks before the release, great.
>
> Otherwise, I think we should remove it from the reactor or delete it
> before the release rather that retain an inflexible dependency on cdh4.
>
> Steve
> On December 3, 2016 at 2:08:35 PM, Suneel Marthi (suneel.marthi@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> Ok with me, unless there r active users of pig that may have objections.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 3, 2016, at 2:51 PM, sblackmon <sblackmon@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > In attempting to resolve STREAMS-155, I’m finding that switching from
> pig version 0.11.0-cdh4.6.0 to apache pig 0.11.2 breaks the tests. The fix
> does not appear to be trivial.
> >
> > I’ll just ask outright if anyone has any interest in maintaining the pig
> binding? If not I’m inclined to remove it from the reactor or delete it
> outright.
> >
> > Steve
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message