Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0AD200BC8 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:29:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 5998E160AFD; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A299B160AEC for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:29:15 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 30147 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2016 18:29:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@streams.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@streams.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@streams.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30135 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2016 18:29:14 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:29:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 155E1CDB0A for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:29:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.88 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0W9AKDxN8qTm for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1CBE95FC26 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id a197so89496517wmd.0 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:29:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0wU/Kcm51NsxFYotzi2K/9tuXaq8vXyGBMctZ29Tg0Q=; b=d5nieBebOU4I+voJ5dHot+oHEseB1p26/TPO4D+L2gj/WgSWlWRu2tb0nkLQW/IvUC UONYhxVwWEkulutiVGiIjGb4e1s281oOdJ3CfwxUL/8Kp6os6TvDKKFAaPPQ7k8+qGTz BWVNOkbD/Q6wZwodlfKvKD6xP3gypjliyo3dLlwwKSEUMaRyfiEE7os+VZoWclVV7gSQ OUrABASrEQLdZwfKBw0pMkD7Hr7O7nxRlWYM5kWSHr6lj10zeWvsFOsxgEKUwYWZtkRh a6WW2NMDlh9fjUirQ14gRGd2cvh/pfi4tztQI/MwOmbxo0zqMJD+DFRt8GvyX6GBUACn mBmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0wU/Kcm51NsxFYotzi2K/9tuXaq8vXyGBMctZ29Tg0Q=; b=ALeCW51vtp8s5NSMUNtqN1NsUtt1j437oLjPPE4lNrdIMvZLM4nxH7UO0INCMGXJmy 9wIx1o7HGS+e4p9oTZqaGi1RwRwE1WMWyZjBDSoMfITRGwhUlOjUfcWlpakaoeMOhYvt 6cG1B8fj60ABs6q4ArzXjWUZ7J6L8WjTZ8joPwGtgfZvEtaubZ6T0IAYCt7fAEJJgRyp 2TM3hbNV/uCRO6sNZuZ3kuJRmIWZqqz0A7eJG/eDJmmDzcJG6dwS0Kxn3crNRQJR+bWG jV2tsH9+Aq6Ldnb47JsU7jZLFTeTN8RBXKq8ruzLdreEtpqa0N0PVofqbaEUO3I35nlJ k/7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03Ak6ENJBJ6qGzdDE4SvY/tpwPpYkW6g7mJNl3DuSMKEYF23lvCkG2i67F20E7ZNNdIyligas1Kpm/DYQ== X-Received: by 10.194.172.42 with SMTP id az10mr4512164wjc.145.1479925746524; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:29:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.162.6 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.80.162.6 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:29:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <58E12E93-0B81-4FBB-B933-D93D1489BCAA@hortonworks.com> References: <58E12E93-0B81-4FBB-B933-D93D1489BCAA@hortonworks.com> From: Trevor Grant Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:29:05 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Beam To: dev@streams.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012292966aa81c0541fc1015 archived-at: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:29:16 -0000 --089e012292966aa81c0541fc1015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Knowing nothing about Reactive streams, and already voicing my opinions about beam on this thread, I'd rather see Apache Beam be used if for no other reason than "keeping it in the family", e.g. less worry about managing dependency licenses, etc, etc. Tg Resident neigh-sayer of the thread On Nov 23, 2016 11:25 AM, "Timothy Spann" wrote: > Reactive Streams is very cool, but only used by a few frameworks. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactive_Streams > > Its adoption is slow, but starting to grow. I=E2=80=99ve worked with RxJ= ava and > Project Reactor. Once Spring 5 is out for a bit, then it will probably > time to look at the Reactive Streams API. > > --089e012292966aa81c0541fc1015--