streams-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Setting priorities for 0.4-incubating
Date Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:57:42 GMT
please add me to the list of 'contributors' in Jira.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:56 PM, sblackmon <sblackmon@apache.org> wrote:

> With 0.3-incubating in the books, it’s time to take a look at what is most
> important for the next release.
>
> Here are a few concrete things I propose we tackle in October.  They are
> tagged in JIRA with fixVersion=0.4
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMS-418?filter=12338530
>
> I saw some new issues being created the last few days.  Please keep it up,
> no matter how small!
>
> Major themes:
> * Reboot and Clean-up
> * Provider and Configuration consistency
> * Prep for the AS 2.0 switch
> Also:
> * POC persist integration tests with docker
> * POC provider integration tests that perform collection
> * Fix lingering and simple bugs / documentation
> * Flink example code
>
> If we target early week of October 24 for code freeze and cut rc1 that
> should give us time to get the release passed (hopefully with unanimous
> support from three active IPMC members on PPMC) by our November report.
>
> Feedback welcome!  And feel free to assign yourself or let us someone with
> permissions know if you want to have something assigned to you.
>
> Steve
> On September 28, 2016 at 3:00:01 PM, sblackmon (sblackmon@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Joey brought this up over the weekend and I think a discussion is overdue
> on the topic.
>
> Encouraging community growth and performing regular releases are on our
> list of graduation criteria.
>
> A few easy behaviors we can adopt to take to make progress on these goals:
>   - planning release versions around one or two significant improvements
>   - setting target dates to kick off upcoming releases
>   - prioritizing our backlog after each release
>   - discussing project and community milestones openly on the list
>   - organizing JIRA so that all contributors (especially new) can decide
> where it’s most important to focus their efforts
>
> I think to get things moving again and demonstrate we are capable of
> consistent progress, we should aim to perform a release once per month
> around the end of the month.
>
> As for what to focus on, I think it’s time to discuss adopting Activity
> Streams 2.0, figure out what form that transition would take, and get
> started down that path.  Working implementations demonstrate the
> suitability of the standard and drive it’s adoption, and the prospects of
> this project are closely tied to those of the standard.  Separate DISCUSS
> coming on this topic.
>
> Also important for the ‘reboot’ theme, we should delete any modules we
> aren’t going to maintain, and bring all modules we are going to maintain up
> to acceptable standards - exactly what that means is an open question but
> broadly they should have documentation, code comments, and tests at the
> level of a typical module in a typical TLP.
>
> Expanding the examples to demonstrate how to use streams providers and
> processors within various execution engines and fixing any bugs that have
> been reported is desirable as well.  Adding at least one new example per
> release is a good target for now.
>
> I have created some future versions with target release dates in JIRA and
> invite all committers to associate existing or new issues with those
> releases, or anyone who can’t modify JIRA to summarize their thoughts and
> share with the list and I will incorporate those ideas into JIRA.  This
> should be the default reference for anyone looking for a way to help - look
> at issues associated with the next few releases and the top of the backlog
> and pick something that appeals and is in line with your experience.
>
> Anything else that should be a top priority for the rest of the year?  Or
> other ideas on improving planning and coordination?
>
> Steve
>
> On September 24, 2016 at 1:01:02 PM, apache (sblackmon@apache.org) wrote:
> - This has already come up, but maybe ActivityStreams 2.0 support would
> broaden the community and motivate more work. It's also a concrete
> goal to work toward so people would know where they can start.
> - Steve and I did a little work here a few months ago, but the JIRA
> could reflect the priorities better and I think keep the community working
> in a common direction.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message