Mailing-List: contact dev-help@streams.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@streams.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [RESTART][VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic
To: "dev@streams.incubator.apache.org" <dev@streams.incubator.apache.org>
References: <81a025df-90e8-d4e8-8e1a-4beaaf168f17@douma.nu>
From: Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu>
Message-ID: <d694e579-3b1f-a4ba-8035-78eab1a8a03a@douma.nu>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:07:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <81a025df-90e8-d4e8-8e1a-4beaaf168f17@douma.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
archived-at: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 15:07:14 -0000

As was pointed out to me by the John Arment on general@, the process for
retiring a podling is a bit more elaborate, and with different consequenc=
es
compared to a TLP retirement (see incubator retirement guide link below).=


The most notable difference is that the podling website, in this case
http://streams.apache.org, will be taken down as well.

To make sure everyone has taken note, I'm hereby restarting the vote:

As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote =
on
retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.

The process is described at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement=
=2Ehtml

[ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
[ ] =C2=B10 Proceed according to the majority
[ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justifica=
tion]

Ate


On 2016-09-18 23:27, Ate Douma wrote:
> As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vot=
e on
> retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
>
> The process is described at http://attic.apache.org/process.html
>
> [ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
> [ ] =C2=B10 Proceed according to the majority
> [ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justifi=
cation]
>
> Ate
>