streams-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [GitHub] incubator-streams pull request: STREAMS-106
Date Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:38:29 GMT
It is possible to have code from compliant licenses, but that is ONLY for
when you are pulling in from another open source project.  Donations that
are new code within the codebase should all be ASL 2.0


On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Steve Blackmon [W2O Digital] <
sblackmon@w2odigital.com> wrote:

> I'm no mentor but my understanding is that they should all have A
> compliant header, but that original authors might prefer to use a slightly
> different header, with Apache 2 license but different copyright details.
>
> Steve Blackmon
>
> > On Jun 10, 2014, at 4:48 PM, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <
> renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Cool news! But just a quick question here, mustn't all files inside an
> > Apache project have an Apache license header? I mean they already
> submitted
> > their code to Apache Streams right? [1]
> > BTW I am in no hurry to get this in ;) but just trying to understand
> better
> > how we are supposed to deal with sort of situations.
> >
> >
> > Renato M.
> >
> > [1]
> http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr3xASyNtdxBMQsFzztPqqb8VUttdUsrjhp7f3zhPssYrjhp7f3HFLf6QQm66jhOYYCCrEgfSNlmI0kojGhzlJrBPpxeF6dmRKnd-Owe76zBB_HYOesuujWZOW8V4tMV4syyZORQr8EGEEIYG7DR8OJMddECQPt-jLuZXTLuVKVI05GSS9_M073_8WvB8SbA_R3UQU76QfcBU_dKc2WabUULgwvJyGJo764WAoRrmVs5kD7ZlFQEmr8reIuRrr4_U02rvjKCr1vF6y0QJxakMKSgdbFEwB2Pp3pRynFefWHgQgbdDDCy2fyPvQCAq81w4wIq41IobETsdLK6TO9I
> >
> >
> > 2014-06-10 21:37 GMT+02:00 Steve Blackmon <steve@blackmon.org>:
> >
> >> I’ve merged license headers on all modules that I initially committed
> into
> >> master.  There are additional modules by other authors impacted by this
> >> pull request.  I’ll give everyone a few days to check out the PR and
> let us
> >> know if you want any of the files you committed to have a header
> different
> >> from the header being added in the PR.  Otherwise I’ll apply the patch
> to
> >> the rest of the files, which should bring all of the files in the
> project
> >> to a good place and complete this story.  At that point I think we
> should
> >> enable rat so the list can get notified if new classes get added that
> are
> >> missing license headers.
> >>
> >> Thanks for helping us out with this Renato!
> >>
> >> Steve Blackmon
> >> sblackmon@apache.org
> >>
> >>> On Jun 5, 2014, at 3:26 PM, renato2099 <git@git.apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Github user renato2099 commented on the pull request:
> >>
> http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsS73gArhoKCMOUqekNNKVJd5AsYeKCYedFEIzDxNEVKeudFEIzDxRQTDzqqb339EVuujjdQ87XoGHm0ac9R8NGSJOVIMDkz6HqTbC_pg73zhOO_R-p7eff9ZuVt4syeUsyehhuVqWdAklkkmul3PWApmU6CQPqpK_9TLuZXTLsTsSjDdqymohBcCSgVvdmSNfYB2Pp3pRynFefWHj5CPPYpu0Olad-KHY9BS7QT3hOYy-rgYOnzYSUMbEELzyZ21-SaGRwsojGhzlJrBMlisvRmDixpIxIWNXlJIj_w09JZeWpI5-Aq83iS4Fj2Xp0QKCy2kbdAdDm9uAU_GJ3h0ISuuq88-bd_iqhEw60i2NEg6NwKztMS-UrZCBt1CBl5Os
> >>>
> >>>   Cool Matt! I will find another task to tackle.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
> >> your
> >>> reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
> >> feature
> >>> enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working,
> >> please
> >>> contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA
> >> ticket
> >>> with INFRA.
> >>> ---
> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message