streams-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Letourneau <>
Subject Re: Integration with Storm and Cassandra Java Driver
Date Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:15:10 GMT
Matt's desire might create an even more complex architecture, though a
wonderful goal.  I wouldn't be opposed to just picking a solution and
designing around it for the purposes of getting the end to end
solution running and then revisiting the appropriate abstractions.

I had seen Kafka when starting out on the initial code base, I thought
it held serious promise for Streams.

Advantage of Camel is the ability to deploy as part of the web archive
vs a standalone service, if Kafka/Storm bring that as well, sounds
cool to me.  They seem to bring the high performance hammer of doom -
rock on. \\m//

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Matt Franklin <> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Danny Sullivan <>wrote:
>> Thanks for the info Steve.
>> As I understand, Kafka would take the place of the functionality of what
>> ActiveMQ does now. Storm would take place of what Camel does now.
> I think in the long term we need to have a flexible architecture with a few
> implementations.  The way I see it, we need collection, orchestration,
> processing pipeline, persistence and exposure.  If there is a way that we
> can define each of these components loosely coupled enough to where we
> could have a Kafka OR AMQP routing implementation that would be ideal.  I
> haven't thought through exactly how to do this myself, but wanted to offer
> that things may not be mutually exclusive.

View raw message