Mailing-List: contact dev-help@streams.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@streams.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jletourneau80@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAL8syOYwN9tHcZgM14R9HXauRwvLiNSWU5L=D5nc4nfAVSLTeQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAL8syOZNQB3XRCq9PC7hR-_FAbfL7kN1n-RHPOp_ytFh2mnkzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAENpzYUBX3pBUn+zkpy3VBddrpWMR4K_Zvi911P0oRi=Jfw3dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL8syOYwN9tHcZgM14R9HXauRwvLiNSWU5L=D5nc4nfAVSLTeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:14:55 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAL8syOYaHKqPfApvddCxgM_m-TopP2UBgsAmM4+7bAJ4UEmtuA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Streams Master 0.1-incubating Release
From: Jason Letourneau <jletourneau80@gmail.com>
To: dev@streams.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

So i most certainly messed this up a bit by releasing from the staging
repo prior to the IPMC vote...as Matt stated though we have the IPMC
votes in our group, so hopefully this clunky first release won't be
noticed too much...my thoughts are that starting the VOTE on general
would be appropriate now and to identify that this misstep has
occurred...any thoughts to the contrary? Or suggestions for a way
forward?

Jason

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jason Letourneau
<jletourneau80@gmail.com> wrote:
> A question on process.  As I understand, in the nexus repo I am
> supposed to release the binary as a result of our vote at this time,
> but upon re-reading your post - I am to wait and put the closed repo
> up for vote in the staging area?
>
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.franklin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Jason Letourneau
>> <jletourneau80@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Discussion thread for .1-incubating release of streams master POM
>>
>> Since we are nearing the end of the vote and we are still on track, I
>> just wanted to remind everyone that while in the incubator, a  release
>> has two VOTES to go through.  The first vote is within the project dev
>> list and requires 3 PPMC members to cast +1 in order to move on.  Upon
>> success of the first vote, the second will take place on the
>> general@incubator.a.o list and requires 3 IPMC +1s for release.
>>
>> The good thing about having 3 or more mentors on an incubator project
>> is that each is also an IPMC member.  This means that a successful DEV
>> list vote with 3 or more mentors casting a +1 only needs to go for a
>> lazy consensus vote to the IPMC.  You can look through the general
>> list archives to see how this has worked in the past.
>>
>> -Matt