streams-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Letourneau <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Streams Master 0.1-incubating Release
Date Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:14:55 GMT
So i most certainly messed this up a bit by releasing from the staging
repo prior to the IPMC Matt stated though we have the IPMC
votes in our group, so hopefully this clunky first release won't be
noticed too thoughts are that starting the VOTE on general
would be appropriate now and to identify that this misstep has
occurred...any thoughts to the contrary? Or suggestions for a way


On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jason Letourneau
<> wrote:
> A question on process.  As I understand, in the nexus repo I am
> supposed to release the binary as a result of our vote at this time,
> but upon re-reading your post - I am to wait and put the closed repo
> up for vote in the staging area?
> Jason
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Matt Franklin <> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Jason Letourneau
>> <> wrote:
>>> Discussion thread for .1-incubating release of streams master POM
>> Since we are nearing the end of the vote and we are still on track, I
>> just wanted to remind everyone that while in the incubator, a  release
>> has two VOTES to go through.  The first vote is within the project dev
>> list and requires 3 PPMC members to cast +1 in order to move on.  Upon
>> success of the first vote, the second will take place on the
>> general@incubator.a.o list and requires 3 IPMC +1s for release.
>> The good thing about having 3 or more mentors on an incubator project
>> is that each is also an IPMC member.  This means that a successful DEV
>> list vote with 3 or more mentors casting a +1 only needs to go for a
>> lazy consensus vote to the IPMC.  You can look through the general
>> list archives to see how this has worked in the past.
>> -Matt

View raw message