streams-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Streams Master 0.1-incubating Release
Date Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:18:55 GMT
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jason Letourneau
<jletourneau80@gmail.com> wrote:
> So i most certainly messed this up a bit by releasing from the staging
> repo prior to the IPMC vote...as Matt stated though we have the IPMC
> votes in our group, so hopefully this clunky first release won't be
> noticed too much...my thoughts are that starting the VOTE on general
> would be appropriate now and to identify that this misstep has
> occurred...any thoughts to the contrary? Or suggestions for a way
> forward?

Replied in my other e-mail.  I would send an e-mail to general asking
for guidance.  Note that it was a mistake and that you realize the
IPMC as a whole needs to vote; but in this case you do have 4 +1s from
IPMC members.

>
> Jason
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jason Letourneau
> <jletourneau80@gmail.com> wrote:
>> A question on process.  As I understand, in the nexus repo I am
>> supposed to release the binary as a result of our vote at this time,
>> but upon re-reading your post - I am to wait and put the closed repo
>> up for vote in the staging area?
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.franklin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Jason Letourneau
>>> <jletourneau80@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Discussion thread for .1-incubating release of streams master POM
>>>
>>> Since we are nearing the end of the vote and we are still on track, I
>>> just wanted to remind everyone that while in the incubator, a  release
>>> has two VOTES to go through.  The first vote is within the project dev
>>> list and requires 3 PPMC members to cast +1 in order to move on.  Upon
>>> success of the first vote, the second will take place on the
>>> general@incubator.a.o list and requires 3 IPMC +1s for release.
>>>
>>> The good thing about having 3 or more mentors on an incubator project
>>> is that each is also an IPMC member.  This means that a successful DEV
>>> list vote with 3 or more mentors casting a +1 only needs to go for a
>>> lazy consensus vote to the IPMC.  You can look through the general
>>> list archives to see how this has worked in the past.
>>>
>>> -Matt

Mime
View raw message