streampipes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <>
Subject Re: December Podling Report - Draft
Date Sun, 01 Dec 2019 14:23:52 GMT
And perhaps fix a typo in the question: 
 ### Are there any issues that the IPMC or ASF Board need to be aware of?
 There are no issues right now.

If you write there now are issues, they'll definitely ask which ones (I am assuming you wanted
to say "no" issues)

### How has the project developed since the last report?

I'd probably mention that this is the first report and that the main work was doing all the
legal paperwork, which is now covered and that you're working on cleaning things up (merging
repos) to finally bring them to Apache.

### Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks?
You didn't actually "do" the official podlingnamesearch, you created the issue for it ...
it's not yet resolved (or is it?) ... so I'd say: You initiated the podlingnamesearch (perhaps
with a date you started it on as that might increase the pressure for the others to finish

But besides that, I am totally OK with the report.


Am 01.12.19, 14:57 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" <>:

    Thanks Philipp!
    I added to new items under "How has the project developed since the last report" mentioning
the submission of ICLAs, software grant and CCLA.
    There is now also a draft in the wiki:
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Philipp Zehnder <> 
    Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2019 2:50 PM
    Subject: Re: December Podling Report - Draft
    thanks Dominik, I think the report looks good.
    Can you please add that all initial committers filed the ICLAs. Further the software grant
and CCLA were submitted.
    > On 1. Dec 2019, at 14:36, Dominik Riemer <> wrote:
    > Hi all,
    > although I was hoping that we'll manage to complete the initial setup 
    > before the first board report, it is time to finish our report.
    > Please have a look at the draft below and send any comments you have!
    > Dominik
    > ## StreamPipes
    > StreamPipes is a self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non- 
    > technical users to connect, analyze and explore (Industrial) IoT data 
    > streams.
    > StreamPipes has been incubating since 2019-11-11.
    > ### Three most important unfinished issues to address before graduating:
    >  1. Finish the initial setup
    >  2. Make a first Apache release
    >  3. Grow the community
    > ### Are there any issues that the IPMC or ASF Board need to be aware of?
    > There are now issues right now.
    > ### How has the community developed since the last report?
    > All initial committers have subscribed to the new mailing list. We 
    > started to spread the project on Twitter and other channels to reach 
    > more potential community members, but currently, the main priority is 
    > to move the project infrastructure to Apache.
    > There was also one event focused on extending the developer base:
    > * We gave a talk at a meetup on "Self-Service IoT Data Analytics with 
    > StreamPipes" (~70 participants)
    > ### How has the project developed since the last report?
    > Most work during the last month was focused around setting up StreamPipes:
    > * Creation of mailing lists
    > * Setting up the new StreamPipes Jira
    > * We made a last pre-Apache release and started to refactor our code 
    > (restructuring the code base to reflect the new repository structure)
    > * The website and documentation is already moved to Apache Git 
    > repositories, and a draft is online at, 
    > however, we need to wait to "announce" the web page and forward 
    > traffic from the existing domains until the Git repos are all 
    > transferred
    > * Right now, we are waiting to transfer our existing Git repos from 
    > the streampipes organization to the Apache organization on Github
    > * We are also waiting to get admin accesss to the StreamPipes instance 
    > on Jira to import existing issues to the new issue tracker
    > ### How would you assess the podling's maturity?
    > Please feel free to add your own commentary.
    >  - [x] Initial setup
    >  - [ ] Working towards first release
    >  - [ ] Community building
    >  - [ ] Nearing graduation
    >  - [ ] Other:
    > ### Date of last release:
    >  XXXX-XX-XX
    > ### When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
    > No new committers were elected beyond the initial committers. We'll 
    > focus on attracting new committers once the initial setup is finished.
    > ### Have your mentors been helpful and responsive?
    > Are things falling through the cracks? If so, please list any open 
    > issues that need to be addressed.
    > We would really like to thank our mentors. Chris was very helpful and 
    > responsive in setting up the infrastructure, and all questions we had 
    > on the mailing list were answered immediately by our mentors.
    > ### Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks?
    > Are 3rd parties respecting and correctly using the podlings name and 
    > brand? If not what actions has the PPMC taken to correct this? Has the 
    > VP, Brand approved the project name?
    > * We did an initial podling name search and created a ticket to get 
    > the name approved in Jira.
    > ### Signed-off-by:
    >  - [ ] (streampipes) Christofer Dutz  
    >     Comments:  
    >  - [ ] (streampipes) Jean-Baptiste Onofré  
    >     Comments:  
    >  - [ ] (streampipes) Julian Feinauer  
    >     Comments:  
    >  - [ ] (streampipes) Justin Mclean  
    >     Comments:  
    >  - [ ] (streampipes) Kenneth Knowles  
    >     Comments:  
    > ### IPMC/Shepherd notes:

View raw message