stratos-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Imesh Gunaratne <im...@apache.org>
Subject Re: "isVolumeRequired" is required when persistence section is mentioned?
Date Wed, 25 Mar 2015 01:12:45 GMT
+1 A good point Lahiru, we will not need a separate property for this.

Thanks

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Udara Liyanage <udara@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Earlier we used this property in service definition so it can switch
> on/off with this property. Yes we can get rid of this.
> On 24 Mar 2015 23:04, "Lahiru Sandaruwan" <lahirus@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In the new model, we get the persistence volume details in
>> subscribableInfo. As per older implementations we had "isVolumeRequired"
>> field, where we got the information from cartridge definition.
>>
>> IMO we can get rid of this field since user can specify the persistence
>> portion of the json when it is really required.
>>
>> Any objections?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Lahiru Sandaruwan
>> Committer and PMC member, Apache Stratos,
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com
>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>>
>> phone: +94773325954
>> email: lahirus@wso2.com blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/
>> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146
>>
>>


-- 
Imesh Gunaratne

Technical Lead, WSO2
Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos

Mime
View raw message