Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stratos-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stratos-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A00CC17EEE for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99015 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2014 08:50:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stratos-dev-archive@stratos.apache.org Received: (qmail 98964 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2014 08:50:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stratos.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stratos.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stratos.apache.org Received: (qmail 98953 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2014 08:50:15 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:50:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vc0-f170.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username imesh, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:50:14 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id la4so395113vcb.29 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 01:50:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.221.3.195 with SMTP id nz3mr4311243vcb.43.1414572613935; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 01:50:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.219.197 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 01:49:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Imesh Gunaratne Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:19:53 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Migrating to Kubernetes 0.4.1 To: dev Cc: Lakmal Warusawithana Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01293fe429a9b805068bdaf4 --089e01293fe429a9b805068bdaf4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Nirmal, I have already started working on this. I'm looking into the new functionality they have introduced to allocate virtual IPs to services. Thanks On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I am going to migrate our setup to Kubernetes 0.4.1 and also the API > client, if there's any changes needed. > > After Kubernetes 0.4.1, K8s team is doing a drastic change by introducing > an IP for a service proxy. With this we might have to do some changes to > the way we access service proxies now. They're still working on > implementing this e2e. > > I'll keep you posted. > > -- > Best Regards, > Nirmal > > Nirmal Fernando. > PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, > Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. > > Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ > -- Imesh Gunaratne Technical Lead, WSO2 Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos --089e01293fe429a9b805068bdaf4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Nirmal,

I have already started worki= ng on this. I'm looking into the new functionality they have introduced= to allocate virtual IPs to services.

Thanks
=

On Wed, Oct= 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Nirmal Fernando <nirmal070125@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
Hi Guys,=

I am going to migrate our setup to Kubernetes 0.4.1 and= also the API client, if there's any changes needed.

After Kubernetes 0.4.1, K8s team is doing a drastic change by introd= ucing an IP for a service proxy. With this we might have to do some changes= to the way we access service proxies now. They're still working on imp= lementing this e2e.

I'll keep you posted.

= --
Best Regards,
Nirmal

Nirmal Fernando.
= PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos,
Senior Software Engineer,= WSO2 Inc.




--
Imesh Gunaratne

Technical Lead, WSO2
Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos
--089e01293fe429a9b805068bdaf4--