From dev-return-55944-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@storm.apache.org Sun Mar 18 21:09:45 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AC673180645 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 21:09:44 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 75765 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2018 20:09:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@storm.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@storm.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@storm.apache.org Received: (qmail 75754 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2018 20:09:42 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:09:42 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id BB713F328A; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:09:42 +0000 (UTC) From: srdo To: dev@storm.apache.org Reply-To: dev@storm.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] storm issue #2594: storm-kafka: encapsulated Broker.host and port Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20180318200942.BB713F328A@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Github user srdo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2594 The changes look good, but I'm wondering whether it makes sense to make this kind of improvement. We're planning to remove storm-kafka from master soon, we're just waiting on a couple of other issues to resolve first https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2953. Unless storm-kafka ends up not getting removed, this change might end up not getting released. ---