Mailing-List: contact issues-help@steve.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@steve.apache.org
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 23:13:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: "dw yu (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@steve.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12952587.1458679447000.525953.1473376400600@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12952587.1458679447000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12952587.1458679447000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.12952587.1458679447083@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (STEVE-37) Consider having multiple simultaneous
 elections
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 23:13:22 -0000


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STEVE-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15475312#comment-15475312 ] 

dw yu commented on STEVE-37:
----------------------------

That's really cool. I would be interested in seeing more graphs of different information you pull from these logs.
http://mobiusfinalfantasyhack.com

> Consider having multiple simultaneous elections
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STEVE-37
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STEVE-37
>             Project: Steve
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sebb
>
> There were such a huge number of votes this time that it was very difficult to follow, especially since the different types of votes were not grouped together.
> I think it would have been a lot easier if all the Emeritus votes had been together on a separate vote. Or at least grouped together.
> Likewise the Board election was randomly hidden among the other votes.
> It should have been first, along with any other STV votes.
> Maybe there should have been 3 separate elections:
> Board+Omnibus
> Members
> Emeritus
> Or at least have them on separate top-level pages.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)