steve-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sam Ruby (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (STEVE-37) Consider having multiple simultaneous elections
Date Thu, 08 Sep 2016 23:44:21 GMT


Sam Ruby updated STEVE-37:
    Comment: was deleted

(was: That's really cool. I would be interested in seeing more graphs of different information
you pull from these logs.

> Consider having multiple simultaneous elections
> -----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: STEVE-37
>                 URL:
>             Project: Steve
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sebb
> There were such a huge number of votes this time that it was very difficult to follow,
especially since the different types of votes were not grouped together.
> I think it would have been a lot easier if all the Emeritus votes had been together on
a separate vote. Or at least grouped together.
> Likewise the Board election was randomly hidden among the other votes.
> It should have been first, along with any other STV votes.
> Maybe there should have been 3 separate elections:
> Board+Omnibus
> Members
> Emeritus
> Or at least have them on separate top-level pages.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message